COVER
ATLAS
TIMELINE
RIBBONS
STAMPS
POSTERS
BOOKS
ABOUT
get an e-mail update!
This article is from
Upfront
April 1999
|
|
|
|
Upfront
Unacceptable Delay
Six Thousand Men Will Die While NCI Stalls, NPCC Says
April 21, 1999. A two-month delay
in a Senate meeting about prostate cancer scheduled six months ago
for Thursday, April 22, 1999 was announced at the last minute this
week. The meeting was supposed to hear from directors of the National
Institutes of Health and the National Cancer Institute on progress
in prostate cancer research so that money to close a research gap
can be quickly allocated.
NCI's stalling breaks plans involving
Dr. Andy Von Eschenbach of MD Anderson Cancer Center, Senator Robert
Dole, Michael Milken testifying on behalf of CaP CURE, and Bill
Schwartz, Vice-Chair of the National Prostate Cancer Coalition.
NPCC's president, Jay Hedlund, evidently
upset about the delay, called it "unacceptable." Hedlund
is urging prostate cancer patients and supporters to write, call,
and E-mail the Senator who arranged for the hearing in the Senate,
Arlen Specter (Republican, PA) Chairman of the Labor, HHS, and Education
Appropriations Subcommittee:
The Honorable Arlen Specter
United States Senate
Washington, DC 20510
(see Hedlund's letter below).
Thursday's meeting, now canceled,
was supposed to hear from the Directors of the National Institutes
of Health, Dr. Harold Varmus, and of the National Cancer Institute,
Dr. Richard Klausner. They were expected to report their plans for
prostate cancer research. Spending for prostrate cancer research,
the US Congress found in October 1998, has not kept pace with scientific
opportunities and the proportion of men who are afflicted with this
disease.
The National Institutes of Health (NIH)
has been "strongly urged to make prostate cancer a top priority
when it hands out money for research." NPCC says. NIH has been
"urged to consult closely with the research community, clinicians,
patient advocacy groups, and the Congress to identify promising
new avenues of basic and clinical research."
NIH was ordered in October 1998 to
develop a report to be presented to the House and Senate Committees
on Appropriations within six months outlining the professional judgment
for prostate cancer research within the next five years. The Secretary
and the Director were told last fall that by this month, April 1999,
they must get themselves up to speed on prostate cancer and present
a plan for funding and implementing the agency's prostate cancer
research portfolio for fiscal years 1999 and 2000.
The April 22 meeting was expressly
to receive NIH's report on these matters. The hearing was scheduled
by the Senate Labor, HHS, and Education Appropriations Subcommittee.
Dr. Harold Varmus and Dr. Richard Klausner knew that among those
gathered to hear review and respond to their reports on plans for
prostate cancer research would be Dr. Andy Von Eschenbach of MD
Anderson Cancer Center, Senator Robert Dole, Michael Milken testifying
on behalf of CaP CURE, and Bill Schwartz, Vice-Chair of the NPCC.
Tuesday, April 20, the hearing was
canceled when Dr. Varmus of NIH told the subcommittee that he would
not be prepared to submit his report until sometime in June. The
NPCC immediately announced that "this delay in reporting and
implementing a more aggressive strategy for prostate cancer research
at NIH is unacceptable."
Jay Hedlund, president of NPCC, is
asking prostate cancer patients and supporters to let NIH know that
the prostate cancer community "will not sit idly by during
delays in research." "Too many lives hang in the balance,"
he said Tuesday. "Please write or e-mail Dr. Varmus and tell
him that you are unhappy with the delays in the NIH report, that
NIH's research on prostate cancer has been inadequate for too long.
Insist that NIH show a bold new commitment to patients by promptly
completing a five-year research plan and by funding significant
increases in clinical and translational research on prostate cancer
beginning this year!"
On behalf of the National Prostate Cancer Coalition, Hedlund sent
this letter to Dr. Varmus:
Letter
to Dr. Harold Varmus from Jay Hedlund, NPCC
April 20, 1999
Harold Varmus, M.D.
Director National Institutes of Health
Bethesda, MD 20892-0148
Dear Dr. Varmus:
I am writing to express the deep dismay and concern of the National
Prostate Cancer Coalition at the failure of the National Institutes
of Health to comply with the congressional directive to report a
five-year prostate cancer research plan this month. We understand
from the Senate Appropriations Subcommittee on Labor, Health and
Human Services and Education that you indicated you were not prepared
to submit this report at the hearing scheduled for Thursday, April
22, and would not be prepared to do so until June.
Dr. Varmus, the history of prostate cancer research at the NIH has
been characterized by too much neglect and indifference. In directing
you to report, the Congress found last year that:
Spending for prostate cancer research over the years has not kept
sufficient pace with the scientific opportunities and the proportion
of the male population who are afflicted with this disease. This
has resulted in significant gaps in scientific and clinical knowledge
that contribute to the ongoing morbidity and mortality directly
attributable to prostate cancer.
Given this finding by the Congress and the specific instruction
to report by April, your failure to be prepared suggests a continued
indifference to making prostate cancer a priority at NIH. The million
men currently living with their diagnosis of prostate cancer and
the 500 additional men diagnosed each new day and their families
should be able to expect a committed effort from the NIH in the
fight against prostate cancer. We strongly believe, as the Congress
found, that effort to have been woefully insufficient in the past.
Prostate cancer research has been underfunded and uncoordinated.
The prostate cancer community firmly believed that this report represented
a real chance to change that path. Your delay seriously undermines
our confidence that NIH is committed to waging an effective fight
against prostate cancer.
During this two-month delay, more than 6,000 American men will die
from prostate cancer. How do we explain to their families that the
National Institutes of Health has chosen to delay making prostate
cancer a more urgent priority?
Sincerely,
Jay H. Hedlund President & CEO
cc: Sen. Ted Stevens
Sen. Robert Byrd
Sen. Arlen Specter
Sen. Tom Harkin
Rep. C.W. Bill Young
Rep. John Porter
Rep. David Obey
|