PSA Rising - welcome!
powered by FreeFind
  • PSA Rising Home | blog latest entry| newswire | forums | books | about
  • Daily Entries
March 2006
S M T W T F S
« Feb   Apr »
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031  
  • TOPICS
    • Prostate Cancer
    • Provenge
    • Taxotere
    • Nutrition
    • Drug Info
    • Satraplatin
    • Activism
    • Jobs, Work, Disability
    • QOL
    • Fatigue
    • Legal issues
    • COX-2 inhibitors
    • Health Insurance
    • Imclone - Erbitux
    • Cancer
    • Vitamin D3
    • African American Cancer Disparities
    • Medical Ethics
    • Pollution
    • Thalidomide
    • Death & Dying
    • Avastin
    • ED
    • Treatment choice
    • Proton beam
    • Herbal Medicine
    • BPH
    • ADT: androgen deprivation tx
    • treatment side effects
    • Acapodene
    • Clinical trials
    • Clinical trial results
    • Vaccines
    • Brachytherapy
    • Vitamin-Mineral Supplements
    • Phenoxodiol
  • RSS feed
  • LINKS
    • Cancer Journals

      • Cancer Research (an AACR journal)
      • Clinical Cancer Research (an AACR Journal
    • Cancer Research

      • AACR
    • Environmental Health

      • Environmental Health Perspectives
    • Healthcare, insurance

      • Metastar
      • BenefitsCheckUpRx
      • Medicare & Prescription Help
      • Medicare
      • Eldercare locator
    • Home

      • PSA Rising
    • Medical Ethics

      • The Hutch "UNINFORMED CONSENT"
    • Nutrition

      • Consumer Lab Reviews
      • Dietary Supplements Info
      • Food Routes
      • nutrition.org
      • The New Farm
    • Prostate Cancer

      • Being a Patient (New York Times)
      • Free Multigraph
      • Fatigue
      • Angiogenesis section at Nature, 12/05
      • Terry Van Dyke's Lab
      • FDA > Trelstar
      • Xinlay - FDA review docs
      • My Cancer Blog - Daniel
      • WARRIOR GORD'S PCD
      • GRUPO DE APOYO PARA EL CANCER DE PROSTATA
      • Living with prostate cancer, a patient blog
      • Spanish Cancer Association
      • Prostate Action: Campaign is the Aim (UK)
      • Cycle for Life
      • San Jose Prostate Cancer Support Group
  • ARCHIVES
    • November 2006
    • October 2006
    • September 2006
    • July 2006
    • June 2006
    • May 2006
    • April 2006
    • March 2006
    • February 2006
    • January 2006
    • December 2005
    • November 2005
    • September 2005
  • Valid XHTML
  • XFN

Search just this blog

Join to add comments or your story

  • Register
  • Login

advertising

Eat to Beat Prostate Cancer Cookbook

Eat to Beat Prostate Cancer Cookbook Author: David Ricketts; buy New: $12.97

Intimacy with Impotence by Ralph Alterowitz

Intimacy with Impotence: The Couple's Guide to Better Sex after Prostate Disease by Ralph Alterowitz, Barbara Alterowitz. Price: $10.20

March 22, 2006

PET Scan Identifies Best Responders to Esophegal Cancer Therapy

category: Cancer posted by admin @ 8:34 pm

New research at Wake Forest University Baptist Medical Center shows that Positron Emission Tomography (PET) is more accurate than conventional imaging in identifying patients who have good responses to chemotherapy and radiation treatment – a finding that could one day help some patients avoid surgery.

The results, from a study of 64 patients with esophageal cancer, are published in the April issue of Annals of Surgery. PET, a technology that produces images of the metabolic function of tissue, was used to test patients for cancer after treatment with a combination of chemotherapy and radiation (chemoradiation).

“While additional multi-center studies are needed, the research clearly shows that PET is a useful tool for identifying patients who respond well to chemoradiation,” said Edward A. Levine, M.D., lead investigator. “Being able to identify these responders may alter the need to take some patients to surgery.”

Over the past two decades, the most common treatment for esophageal cancer has been chemoradiation followed by surgery. Even with these treatments, the prognosis is poor for most patients, with long-term control rates of 25 to 35 percent. Some patients, however, respond well to chemoradiation and have improved long-term survival.

Identifying which patients will respond to chemoradiation alone – and perhaps avoid surgery to remove part of the esophagus – has been difficult. Conventional imaging, including both computed tomography (CT) and endoscopic ultrasound (EUS), are poor predictors of response to chemoradiation.

Recently, PET was shown to be more accurate than CT and EUS in evaluating newly diagnosed patients to determine the extent of the disease. So, Wake Forest researchers decided to evaluate its ability to determine response to chemoradiation.

“The technology has allowed us to evaluate the varying responses to chemoradiation in a cross-section of patients,” said Levine, professor of surgery and chief of the Section of Surgical Oncology. “We have identified a subgroup of patients with good long-term control rates and improved long-term survival.”

The researchers conducted the study between 2000 and 2004 in patients whose cancer had not spread beyond the esophagus and lymph nodes. Patients had a PET scan both before and after chemoradiation. Then, four to six weeks later, eligible patients had surgery to remove part of the esophagus. The surgical pathology reports from 41 patients were compared to PET results – and PET was found to be 88 percent accurate at correctly identifying patients without disease.

“These results show the predictive power of pre-treatment PET imaging for identifying patients likely to experience a significant tumor response following a course of pre-operative chemoradiation,” said Levine. “The evidence suggests the potential for PET to change clinical practice, perhaps helping some patients avoid surgery.”

Publication: A prospective evaluation of the impact of 18-F-fluoro-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography staging on survival for patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006 Feb

This study was supported, in part, by a grant from the National Cancer Institute.

Wake Forest Baptist is an academic health system comprised of North Carolina Baptist Hospital and Wake Forest University School of Medicine.

Also see: FDG-PET status following chemoradiotherapy provides high management impact and powerful prognostic stratification in oesophageal cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2006 Mar 21

• • •

No Comments »

No comments yet.

Comments RSS • TrackBack URI

Leave a comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.

PSA Rising: http://www.psa-rising.com