Click for Cover Page
Cover NEWS Support Groups Advocacy Search
Upfront MedBriefs EatingWell Voices Grassroots PCaLinks

ARCHIVE
RIBBONS
STAMPS
POSTERS
TIMELINE

 

Is consensus possible among prostate cancer advocates - or do they divide along treatment lines?



Grassroots
QuickTopics
Board


Grassroots

NPCC says US Too! Never Paid Into Prostate Cancer Coalition

April 3: US Too! Quits Prostate Cancer Coalition
April 5: NPCC Saddened As US Too! Quits

Hank Porterfield In His Own Words

Hank Porterfield chairs Us Too! International, the support group that he turned to when he was diagnosed with prostate cancer: In an interview October 2000 he said:
"The main focus of researchers and clinicians should not be in choosing between the available prostate cancer treatment options but in offering patients better choices with fewer side effects....emphasis should be placed on finding treatments for prostate cancer that don't have all these side effects. Right now our options are very limited. A really Herculean effort is needed to find a way to treat this cancer without destroying the prostate." Surgery or Radiation: Which Is Better for Early Prostate Cancer? By Salynn Boyles WebMD

April 6, 2001. PSA Rising, New York. Staff at National Prostate Cancer Coalition, Inc. (NPCC) in Washington D.C. say they were "very saddened" by the split with leading prostate cancer support and education organization US Too! International.

"The work continues," Alyn Books LaSure said, "we have the same enemy," prostate cancer. NCPP staff Skip Lockwood, Kathy Meade and LaSure said vice-chair and COO Dr. Atkins "can state confidently" that US Too! never made annual donations of fifty thousand dollars to NPCC board. "The figures are not correct," LaSure said, referring to donation levels PSA Rising reported yesterday.

Reacting to our earlier report that this was the donation level set for US Too!'s vote on NPCC board, LaSure replied, "It's possible they were asked" for that amount, but NPCC "did not receive that." Our earlier information came from a former board member. So far no one has been able to tell us why NPCC, which reported a loss in 1998, subsidized US Too's financially healthy operations.

Tom Bruckman, AFUD"This break up "was long overdue," Tom Bruckman, Executive Director of American Foundation for Urologic Disease (AFUD) said late today. "As one of the founding members of the Board, I can tell you US Too! brought nothing to the table except expense reimbursement requests for their travel and hotels."

" In fact," Bruckman said, "... Hank Porterfield, would sit at the table and take notes of all the programs, ideas and key contacts .... take that information back to Chicago and try to implement same. I can not recall one penny of support coming from Chicago and I've been to every meeting since the inception of NPCC."

Dr. Richard Atkins, NPCC vice-chair and COO, asked yesterday if the organization would lose revenue, said: "During the period of time that I have been at NPCC, US Too!, unlike other board organizations, has made no financial contribution to NPCC. Rather, financial support has gone in the other direction, both for Chicago-based staffing and in an 'in-kind' agreement (i.e., that NPCC would not compete for the same program-based financial solicitations on which US Too! depends)."

Mr. Bruckman today was even more forthright. "Last year," he said, "the NPCC secured money ($50,000 approx) for a staff person working out of the US Too! Chicago office, who was supposed to be working on recruiting national advocates to be shared by NPCC and US Too!. Yet nothing ever came back to the NPCC. Apparently US Too! kept all this work for themselves.

" In the meetings I attended," Bruckman said, "[US Too! chair] Hank Porterfield kept promising to hold up his responsibilities as a Trustee yet nothing was ever forthcoming."

The Chicago Office of US Too!, Bruckman said, "torpedoed" NPCC efforts to create a National Advocacy Corps, " telling their regional leaders to boycott the meetings, after they had accepted invitations to participate."

"The ACS, A.F.U.D., Cap Cure and many others have tried to support the NPCC with grants and joint fundraising efforts, yet the Chicago branch of US Too! never participated. Curiously, many of the independent US Too! groups have offered to give 'in kind' support to NPCC and I think that will be the upshot of all this. The NPCC will try to work with anybody who will help in the fight against prostate cancer and many of the support groups and members will independently come forward. Or, when asked, will do what they can."

"I know this," Bruckman said, "because I've had the pleasure of working with so many good people working so hard to find a cure for this awful disease."

On another positive note, Bruckman said, the Prostate Cancer Funders Group, which includes representatives from major PCa Research grant-makers, "calculate that there will be over $400 million spent on PCa research this year. Much of this increase is due to patient activism and involvement in the process of raising awareness."


In Fiscal 1998 National Prostate Cancer Coalition, Inc. reported Contributions of $654,449 and a net loss of $-115,273.

US Too! reported Total Revenue of $488,922, Total Expenditures of $294,109 for a net gain of $194,813.

Financial Statements in Acrobat Reader format from http://www.guidestar

E-mail [email protected]
April 6, 2001
Top
PSA Rising
prostate cancer activist news
http://www.psa-rising.com
© 1997-2001